Overview

Paul Gaston gives contractor standard-of-care opinions for retaining counsel, insurers and owners in Chicago, Cook County and the wider Chicagoland area. He evaluates whether a contractor, subcontractor or trade performed to the industry standard in how the work was planned, sequenced, coordinated and executed, based on decades running the same work as foreman, superintendent and licensed general contractor.

Standard of care is about conduct. It asks what a reasonably careful contractor would have done in the same circumstances, and whether the performance on this project met that measure.

Means and methods

Sequencing, coordination between trades, protection of completed work, supervision and the decisions made in the field are reviewed against how competent contractors handle the same conditions.

Basis for the opinion

Paul has held the roles being examined. Foreman, superintendent and licensed general contractor across commercial, municipal, healthcare and retail projects, including large-scale renovation at O'Hare. That direct experience is what makes an experience-based standard-of-care opinion admissible and useful.
Open-plan living room with full-height glazing overlooking a pool

Prior retentions

Paul has been retained on this basis in construction-defect matters including Scott v. Hartz Construction, Englehaupt v. A.B. Edward Enterprises and Talley v. Thunder Basin Homes.

Questions Attorneys Ask

It is the level of care and skill a reasonably competent contractor would apply in the same circumstances. It covers how work was planned, sequenced, supervised and executed, not whether the design was sound.
A code violation is a failure against a written requirement. Standard of care is broader and covers judgment and practice, so work can meet code and still fall short of accepted practice.
Paul has held the roles under review. Licensed Chicago general contractor, union journeyman carpenter since 1989, and general foreman on large-scale renovation at O'Hare International Airport.
Yes, in construction-defect matters including Scott v. Hartz Construction, Englehaupt v. A.B. Edward Enterprises and Talley v. Thunder Basin Homes.
Yes. Coordination between trades, sequencing, and who was responsible for protecting completed work are core standard-of-care questions he reviews regularly.
No. Design negligence requires a licensed architect or engineer of that discipline. Paul stays with the builder's conduct and refers the design portion out.